Jim Cox - Wikimedia disambiguation page. Article “Jim Cox” in English Wikipedia has 1.7 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025).
Since the creation of article “Jim Cox”, its content was written by 10 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 9 times in English Wikipedia and cited 9 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #632377 09.2009 |
Global: #1028184 09.2009 |
| Best Rank | English: #227663 06.2015 |
Global: #576745 06.2015 |
On 28 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Ali Khamenei, Iran, Ruhollah Khomeini, Jeffrey Epstein, Supreme Leader of Iran, Mohammad Reza I of Iran, 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran, Neil Sedaka, Masoud Pezeshkian, Resident Evil Requiem.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ali Khamenei, 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran, Neil Sedaka, Iran, Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran–Israel conflict, Supreme Leader of Iran, Scream 7, Elimination Chamber (2026), World War III.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.14+0+0+7.14+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
